spotted a bit of an odd correlation, as we drink coffee across from the station
the preponderance of threats is why we accept violence in our media more readily than we accept sex, or even romance.
when confronted by something the human mind can either attack it, or run from it. although this is a binary way of looking at our processes every action taken as a result of confrontation exists nearer of further along the path to one of these conclusions, fight or flight.
sex, in our particular expression of social conciousness, occupies a private sphere, much to our degradation, and being private it encourages flight when presented socially. our social performativity can very quickly dissolve in to the crossing of arms and/or legs, the sighing and tsk'ing, looking anywhere but the screen, conversations about how unnecessary it is to depict the graphic act of, in out in out... the use of euphamisms. any number of symbolic ways to disperse the feeling associated with the presentation of sex, or arousal.
but violence is cherished, savoured. the things around violence are doted upon: pleasure derived from discussion of torture, our fondness for weaponry, aesthetics of agression, colours of conflict, explosions, swearing, alpha behaviour lauded.
i think there is a strong correlation with the activation of our fight/flight response and the comfort of seeing the threat destroyed, even symbolically. we are more prone to assessing whether or not something is a threat than we are for considering whether it
is beautiful, arrousing, smells good, needs a cuddle...
and because our daily consciousness is so filled with threats we become increasingly sensitive to those things which will eliminate a threat, dote on those things more and more, increasing their acceptance.
...just a thought.
when confronted by something the human mind can either attack it, or run from it. although this is a binary way of looking at our processes every action taken as a result of confrontation exists nearer of further along the path to one of these conclusions, fight or flight.
sex, in our particular expression of social conciousness, occupies a private sphere, much to our degradation, and being private it encourages flight when presented socially. our social performativity can very quickly dissolve in to the crossing of arms and/or legs, the sighing and tsk'ing, looking anywhere but the screen, conversations about how unnecessary it is to depict the graphic act of, in out in out... the use of euphamisms. any number of symbolic ways to disperse the feeling associated with the presentation of sex, or arousal.
but violence is cherished, savoured. the things around violence are doted upon: pleasure derived from discussion of torture, our fondness for weaponry, aesthetics of agression, colours of conflict, explosions, swearing, alpha behaviour lauded.
i think there is a strong correlation with the activation of our fight/flight response and the comfort of seeing the threat destroyed, even symbolically. we are more prone to assessing whether or not something is a threat than we are for considering whether it
is beautiful, arrousing, smells good, needs a cuddle...
and because our daily consciousness is so filled with threats we become increasingly sensitive to those things which will eliminate a threat, dote on those things more and more, increasing their acceptance.
...just a thought.
Labels: binary thinking, sex, violence


